<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bwana.org &#187; High Definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bwana.org/tag/high-definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bwana.org</link>
	<description>Gaming, Technology, Social Media, and Fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='www.bwana.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
<link rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" type="application/json" href="http://friendfeed.com/api/public-sup.json#3ffaf93dae"/>		<item>
		<title>Youtube HD vs Facebook HD:  You Be The Judge</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bwana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[720p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtude]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are embeds of the same source video on Facebook and Youtube. You be the judge on which you prefer: Facebook: Youtube: I&#8217;ve noticed the Youtube embed looks better in full screen than the Facebook embed. It looks like the Facebook embed is not even HD! Does Facebook allow HD embeds? It sure doesn&#8217;t look [...]
Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2010/05/17/check-your-facebook-privacy-with-reclaimprivacy/' rel='bookmark' title='Check Your Facebook Privacy With ReclaimPrivacy'>Check Your Facebook Privacy With ReclaimPrivacy</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube API is nice but&#8230;'>Youtube API is nice but&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2009/01/26/youtube-comments-necessary-but-add-no-value/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value'>Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 10px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/"></a></div><p>Here are embeds of the same source video on <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com">Youtube</a>.  You be the judge on which you prefer:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=39641977341">Facebook</a>:<br />
<object width="500" height="281" ><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.facebook.com/v/39641977341" /><embed src="http://www.facebook.com/v/39641977341" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="281"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2gJoBUtxRA">Youtube</a>:<br />
<object width="500" height="308"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/k2gJoBUtxRA&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D22&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/k2gJoBUtxRA&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D22&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308"></embed></object></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the Youtube <em>embed</em> looks better in full screen than the Facebook <em>embed</em>.  <strong>It looks like the Facebook embed is not even HD!</strong>  Does Facebook allow HD embeds?  It sure doesn&#8217;t look like it.  If you <a href="http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=39641977341">click through to the original Facebook video</a> and make it full screen, you&#8217;ll see it looks a lot better than the embed.  Are our HD videos truly free from the walled garden of Facebook?  I don&#8217;t know.  Granted, the Youtube HD embed <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10104182-2.html">requires a hack</a> to the embed string to watch in HD, it still should be noted that there isn&#8217;t a way to embed the Facebook HD at all.  If there is, please let me know in the comments.</p>
<p>As it stands, the Youtube solution is more attractive to me at the moment since I want the HD experience outside of the Youtube site.  Plus, the Youtube community destroys the Facebook <em>video</em> community.  I&#8217;m not sure why Youtube or Facebook won&#8217;t make the HD embed option a main feature.  If <a href="http://blog.dailymotion.com/2008/02/18/dailymotion-in-high-definition-in-a-new-player/">DailyMotion can do it</a>, why can&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2010/05/17/check-your-facebook-privacy-with-reclaimprivacy/' rel='bookmark' title='Check Your Facebook Privacy With ReclaimPrivacy'>Check Your Facebook Privacy With ReclaimPrivacy</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube API is nice but&#8230;'>Youtube API is nice but&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2009/01/26/youtube-comments-necessary-but-add-no-value/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value'>Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Youtube API is nice but&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bwana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Youtube recently announced details of their video API (Application Programmer Interface), allowing developers to create their own concoctions powered by Youtube technology. The wildly anticipated game, Spore, is already on board to use the API in their game to send videos of the game straight to Youtube: Youtube is a massive entity, one of the [...]
Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube HD vs Facebook HD:  You Be The Judge'>Youtube HD vs Facebook HD:  You Be The Judge</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2009/01/26/youtube-comments-necessary-but-add-no-value/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value'>Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 10px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button_count" share_url="http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/"></a></div><p>Youtube recently announced details of their video <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/overview.html">API</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API">Application Programmer Interface</a>), allowing developers to create their own concoctions powered by Youtube technology.  The wildly anticipated game, <a href="http://www.spore.com">Spore</a>, is already on board to <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/youtube-finds-its-way-into-spore.html">use the API</a> in their game to send videos of the game straight to Youtube:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bwana/2328581157/" title="Spore/Youtube Integration by bwana, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2128/2328581157_42d5033839_o.jpg" width="414" height="319" alt="Spore/Youtube Integration" /></a></p>
<p>Youtube is a massive entity, one of the top 5 websites on the web, and it <a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/03/12/youtube-ftw/">deserves some praise</a>, but I have a void that I long for.  </p>
<p>High definition video.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com">Vimeo</a> does it and does it well, so why can&#8217;t Youtube?  They have the massive data capacity of Google behind them as well as the capital, so where is it?  I already know about the <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/03/1723248&#038;from=rss">&#8220;higher quality&#8221; videos</a> that are coming, but they are hardly HD.  I want <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/720p">720p</a>!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like the fact that the API is here and developers can develop, but high definition is here people.  I was in Best Buy the other day and MANY ordinary consumers (not like you and me) were buying HDTVs and high definition camcorders.  They were flying off the shelves.  The age of pixelated telephone videos is passing and higher quality video is here.  Another example, look at the top live video shows on Ustream.tv.  Almost all of them have a high quality picture to accompany their content.  I get many praises and subscribers on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/iobuffa">my Youtube channel</a> solely based on the quality of my videos.  Most people could care less what I&#8217;m saying in the videos, but they love the fact that I produce great quality videos with my Canon Powershot TX1 (and also with my Canon HV20).</p>
<p>So while I praise Youtube for their API (because APIs are always awesome), I can&#8217;t celebrate too long before I utter the words, &#8220;but where&#8217;s HD&#8221;.  Let&#8217;s hope it comes sooner than later.  Here&#8217;s the announcement video of the <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/overview.html">new API</a> in case you haven&#8217;t seen it:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u1zgFlCw8Aw&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u1zgFlCw8Aw&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Related posts:<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube HD vs Facebook HD:  You Be The Judge'>Youtube HD vs Facebook HD:  You Be The Judge</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.bwana.org/2009/01/26/youtube-comments-necessary-but-add-no-value/' rel='bookmark' title='Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value'>Youtube Comments: Necessary, But Add No Value</a></li>
</ul></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bwana.org/2008/03/12/youtube-api-is-nice-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2128/2328581157_42d5033839_o.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2128/2328581157_42d5033839_o.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Spore/Youtube Integration</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

