<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Youtube HD vs Facebook HD:  You Be The Judge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/</link>
	<description>Gaming, Technology, Social Media, and Fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:42:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bwana</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-59979</link>
		<dc:creator>Bwana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-59979</guid>
		<description>I used a 720p source video from my Canon Powershot TX1.  Both videos were encoded from the same source file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used a 720p source video from my Canon Powershot TX1.  Both videos were encoded from the same source file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bwana</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61821</link>
		<dc:creator>Bwana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61821</guid>
		<description>I used a 720p source video from my Canon Powershot TX1.  Both videos were encoded from the same source file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used a 720p source video from my Canon Powershot TX1.  Both videos were encoded from the same source file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marce</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-59977</link>
		<dc:creator>Marce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-59977</guid>
		<description>Could the source file also play a role in the quality? And for the record, what type of source file did you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the source file also play a role in the quality? And for the record, what type of source file did you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marce</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61820</link>
		<dc:creator>Marce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61820</guid>
		<description>Could the source file also play a role in the quality? And for the record, what type of source file did you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the source file also play a role in the quality? And for the record, what type of source file did you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chantal</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-59210</link>
		<dc:creator>chantal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-59210</guid>
		<description>FACEBOOK WINS simply because I can actually watch the whole video without interruptions. Youtube is a disaster - the buffering and stop/go motion turns a 3 minute video into a 10 minute nightmare!!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACEBOOK WINS simply because I can actually watch the whole video without interruptions. Youtube is a disaster &#8211; the buffering and stop/go motion turns a 3 minute video into a 10 minute nightmare!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chantal</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61819</link>
		<dc:creator>chantal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61819</guid>
		<description>FACEBOOK WINS simply because I can actually watch the whole video without interruptions. Youtube is a disaster - the buffering and stop/go motion turns a 3 minute video into a 10 minute nightmare!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACEBOOK WINS simply because I can actually watch the whole video without interruptions. Youtube is a disaster &#8211; the buffering and stop/go motion turns a 3 minute video into a 10 minute nightmare!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wynn</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-58685</link>
		<dc:creator>Wynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-58685</guid>
		<description>How do you switch the video to your Desktop without the video production switcher or manual editing. Do you have a screen capture SW or other apps to achieve this? 
 
Thank You Kindly, 
 
Wynn  
714.881.0911 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you switch the video to your Desktop without the video production switcher or manual editing. Do you have a screen capture SW or other apps to achieve this? </p>
<p>Thank You Kindly, </p>
<p>Wynn<br />
714.881.0911</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wynn</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61818</link>
		<dc:creator>Wynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61818</guid>
		<description>How do you switch the video to your Desktop without the video production switcher or manual editing. Do you have a screen capture SW or other apps to achieve this? 
 
Thank You Kindly, 
 
Wynn  
714.881.0911</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you switch the video to your Desktop without the video production switcher or manual editing. Do you have a screen capture SW or other apps to achieve this? </p>
<p>Thank You Kindly, </p>
<p>Wynn<br />
714.881.0911</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FishTWiT</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-58490</link>
		<dc:creator>FishTWiT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-58490</guid>
		<description>Youtube is my preference. The Facebook feed never buffered once while the Youtube feed had to buffer many times.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is my preference. The Facebook feed never buffered once while the Youtube feed had to buffer many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FishTWiT</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61817</link>
		<dc:creator>FishTWiT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61817</guid>
		<description>Youtube is my preference. The Facebook feed never buffered once while the Youtube feed had to buffer many times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is my preference. The Facebook feed never buffered once while the Youtube feed had to buffer many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-58476</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-58476</guid>
		<description>In terms of straight up quality YouTube wins. But, if you want to talk about overall it is split for me, the FaceBook player looks better in my opinion but the YouTube one is easily embeddable. I also found the YouTube version to buffer a lot more than the Facebook version (which didn&#039;t buffer at all during playback, only at the beginning).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of straight up quality YouTube wins. But, if you want to talk about overall it is split for me, the FaceBook player looks better in my opinion but the YouTube one is easily embeddable. I also found the YouTube version to buffer a lot more than the Facebook version (which didn&#8217;t buffer at all during playback, only at the beginning).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61816</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61816</guid>
		<description>In terms of straight up quality YouTube wins. But, if you want to talk about overall it is split for me, the FaceBook player looks better in my opinion but the YouTube one is easily embeddable. I also found the YouTube version to buffer a lot more than the Facebook version (which didn&#039;t buffer at all during playback, only at the beginning).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of straight up quality YouTube wins. But, if you want to talk about overall it is split for me, the FaceBook player looks better in my opinion but the YouTube one is easily embeddable. I also found the YouTube version to buffer a lot more than the Facebook version (which didn&#8217;t buffer at all during playback, only at the beginning).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd K. Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-58474</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd K. Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-58474</guid>
		<description>I would go with Youtube, because on the post you have the Facebook on top and Youtube on bottom and what I noticed is that the Youtube looks clear. The Facebook one look really cloudy and not as clear from the Youtube sample. 
 
Winner in my book is Youtube! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go with Youtube, because on the post you have the Facebook on top and Youtube on bottom and what I noticed is that the Youtube looks clear. The Facebook one look really cloudy and not as clear from the Youtube sample. </p>
<p>Winner in my book is Youtube!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd K. Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.bwana.org/2008/12/09/youtube-hd-vs-facebook-hd-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-61815</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd K. Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bwana.org/?p=828#comment-61815</guid>
		<description>I would go with Youtube, because on the post you have the Facebook on top and Youtube on bottom and what I noticed is that the Youtube looks clear. The Facebook one look really cloudy and not as clear from the Youtube sample. 
 
Winner in my book is Youtube!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go with Youtube, because on the post you have the Facebook on top and Youtube on bottom and what I noticed is that the Youtube looks clear. The Facebook one look really cloudy and not as clear from the Youtube sample. </p>
<p>Winner in my book is Youtube!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

